|
SCHOOL CHOICE
SETTING THE STAGE FOR INFORMED, OBJECTIVE DELIBERATION ON SCHOOL CHOICE
The debate on school choice has been characterized by overblown, rhetorical
claims that often are at variance with available evidence. This must change.
Policy makers cannot afford to make such important decisions on the basis of
rhetoric.
The 2002 decision of the United States Supreme Court in Zelman v.
Simmons-Harris, upholding the school voucher program implemented in the
Cleveland public school district, brought school choice to the forefront
of educational issues. Policy makers in New Jersey and other states are
being pressed to consider what choice options, if any, should be offered
to students and their parents. Their decisions could fundamentally
alter the manner in which states provide and finance their educational
programs, and could have other major policy implications as well. Given
the potential consequences, it is essential that policy makers be
informed by the best possible legal and educational policy research, and
by the best expert opinion on educational practices and student
outcomes.
The Institute’s project, “Setting the Stage for Informed, Objective
Deliberation on School Choice,” is designed to establish a framework and
a forum for informed and objective consideration of the legal, fiscal
and educational policy issues relating to school choice. The project is
based on the premise that informed discussion of all the relevant issues
is necessary, but not that any particular choice program is certain to
be established or expanded in the near future, in this state or
elsewhere, and not to advocate for any particular conclusion. The goal
is to make a meaningful contribution to the quality of the school choice
debate.
Background Paper. The project was launched in November 2002 with an
invitational meeting of state and national experts on school choice
issues. IELP distributed a background paper, What We Know, and What We
Need to Know, about School Choice, for that meeting.
Tough Choices. The first publication of the project, issued in 2004,
was Tough Choices: Setting the Stage for Informed, Objective
Deliberation on School Choice. Tough Choices sets the
stage by surveying choice programs in New Jersey and other states and
raising several issues that form the backdrop for discussion:
New Jersey, Abbott v. Burke, and School Choice
The School Choice Debate
Evidence of Impacts of School Choice
Redefining “Public Education”
It then discusses the tough choices that have to be made in relation to school choice policy:
Should choice play a larger role in our effort to improve education?
Should New Jersey’s public school choice programs be expanded?
Should New Jersey provide public subsidies for students to enroll in private schools?
What accountability measures should be imposed on school choice programs?
Should New Jersey regulate home schooling?
Should New Jersey authorize, encourage, or regulate cyberschools?
Finally, it identifies what we need to know with recommendations for research:
Comprehensive Evaluations of New Jersey’s Choice Programs
Analysis of Private School Choice
Examination of Compulsory Education Requirements and Enforcement
Additional Reports. Tough Choices will be updated in a forthcoming
volume with an overview of school choice issues for 2005, a 50-state
survey of state laws on school choice, bibliographies and other
resources. And it will be supplemented with additional reports on
selected school choice issues:
New Jersey, Abbott v. Burke and School Choice
New Jersey’s School Choice Programs
School Choice Policy in New Jersey under No Child Left Behind
Setting the Stage for Informed, Objective Deliberation. IELP sponsors
and conducts meetings and discussions of school choice issues; its staff
participates in conferences and meetings sponsored by other
organizations, in New Jersey and throughout the nation, to discuss
school choice issues in our state and elsewhere; and it serves as an
objective resource for education policy makers.
For more information about IELP’s school choice activities, or to
schedule a meeting or conference with your organization to discuss
school choice, contact us at ielp@andromeda.rutgers.edu.
A CLOSER LOOK AT PUBLIC SCHOOL CHOICE IN NEW JERSEY
This project builds on the research and analysis presented in Tough Choices,
but here IELP directs its attention to public school choice issues of particular
interest to the State of New Jersey.
While Tough Choices looks at choice in its broadest sense – vouchers,
magnet schools, charter schools and interdistrict choice as well as home
schooling and cyberschooling -- A Closer Look at Public School Choice in
New Jersey focuses on public school choice. The premise is the same as
in Tough Choices – that choice should be considered in the specific
context of New Jersey’s education policy and the state’s urban education
reform effort. The objective is the same -- to help forge a rational,
comprehensive state policy on public school choice that takes into
account the array of available and potentially available options, seeks
to meld them into a coherent, consistent system, provides appropriate
levels of support for choice, strikes a balance between encouraging
innovation and maintaining accountability, and assures effective
implementation. And the methodology is largely the same -- New Jersey’s
education policies and programs, and their implementation, will be
evaluated against national best practices.
A Closer Look at Public School Choice in New Jersey will culminate in a
report to the New Jersey Commissioner of Education and the Joint
Committee on the Public Schools of the New Jersey State Legislature.
The report will include an evaluation of New Jersey’s public school
choice programs – with special attention to charter schools and the
Interdistrict Public School Choice Program – and a discussion of
accountability issues, issues relating to the exercise of choice under
No Child Left Behind (“NCLB”), and emerging issues such as those
relating to “cyberschool” programs. It also will discuss the
appropriate role of the state in implementing public school choice
policy and its capacity to carry out that role effectively.
Upon completion of the report, IELP will publicize its findings and
recommendations to policy makers and the public, and will consult with
the Commissioner of Education and the State Legislature on the issues
addressed in the report and follow-up discussions. In that sense, this
project will continue the work of Setting the Stage for Informed,
Objective Deliberation on School Choice.
For more information about A Closer Look at Public School Choice in New
Jersey, contact us at ielp@andromeda.rutgers.edu.
Back
|